Lincoln Elementary School District 156
Lincoln Elementary School District 156 is located in northeast Illinois. Lincoln Elementary School District 156 has 1.24 square miles of land area and 0.04 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Lincoln Elementary School District 156 population is 7,611. Lincoln Elementary School District 156 median household income is $53,510 in 2010-2014. Lincoln Elementary School District 156 median house value is $105,500 in 2010-2014. On average, Lincoln Elementary School District 156 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Lincoln Elementary School District 156 Map and Nearby Locations
410 157th St
Calumet City IL, 60409, Cook County
Phone: 708-862-6625
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 1,075 | 1,088 | 1,132 | 1,073 | 1,157 | 1,137 | 1,107 |
English Language Learner Students: | 193 | 212 | 206 | 247 | 198 | 106 | 28 |
Total Teachers: | 59.11 | NA | 55.80 | 56.04 | 63.00 | 64.90 | 55.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 4.00 | 3.33 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 3.03 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Elementary: | 56.11 | NA | 49.80 | 49.68 | 55.00 | 56.90 | 34.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 14.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 17.00 | 43.00 | 11.66 | 11.82 | 10.60 | 11.20 | 18.20 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 24.80 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 4.00 | NA | 3.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 1.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.00 |
School Administrators: | 3.00 | NA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 8.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 3.66 | 4.48 | 3.60 | 4.20 | 5.20 |
Other Support Services: | 9.00 | 9.20 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 7.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 18.19 | NA | 20.29 | 19.15 | 18.37 | 17.52 | 20.13 |
Schools
Lincoln Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 410 157th St, Calumet City IL 60409 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.9% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53.1% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.4% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 71.7% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.4% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.3% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 34.0% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 35.9% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 56.1% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 49.2% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 46.4% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.7% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 43.4% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.2% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.0% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 40.4% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 52.7% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.8% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.1% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 52.7% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 35.5% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 39.0% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 39.0% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.0% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 63.4% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.6% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.5% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 37.9% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.4% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 59.6% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 50.5% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 59.1% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.5% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.7% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 42.0% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 38.3% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.2% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.8% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.6% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 49.1% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.5% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 53.0% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 62% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.0% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.4% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 24.8% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 56.4% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 42.3% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 33.1% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 67.0% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.7% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.7% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 30.0% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 52.4% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.6% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.0% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.7% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 38.0% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 49.0% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 55.1% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 46.1% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.4% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.9% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.5% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.0% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.0% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 21.8% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 27.6% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.4% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.0% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 24.1% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.2% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 39.0% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.6% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.2% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.0% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $13,819,000 | $12,208 | $13,205,000 | $12,307 | $12,606,000 | $10,895 | |||
Federal: | $1,772,000 | $1,565 | 12.8% | $1,590,000 | $1,482 | 12.0% | $3,116,000 | $2,693 | 24.7% |
State: | $9,222,000 | $8,147 | 66.7% | $8,937,000 | $8,329 | 67.7% | $7,053,000 | $6,096 | 55.9% |
Local: | $2,825,000 | $2,496 | 20.4% | $2,678,000 | $2,496 | 20.3% | $2,437,000 | $2,106 | 19.3% |
Total Expenditures: | $12,462,000 | $11,009 | $10,888,000 | $10,147 | $12,070,000 | $10,432 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $11,163,000 | $9,861 | $9,390,000 | $8,751 | $9,874,000 | $8,534 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $5,981,000 | $5,284 | 53.6% | $5,417,000 | $5,048 | 57.7% | $6,199,000 | $5,358 | 62.8% |
Student and Staff Support: | $755,000 | $667 | 6.8% | $713,000 | $664 | 7.6% | $864,000 | $747 | 8.8% |
Administration: | $2,806,000 | $2,479 | 25.1% | $1,645,000 | $1,533 | 17.5% | $1,304,000 | $1,127 | 13.2% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,621,000 | $1,432 | 14.5% | $1,615,000 | $1,505 | 17.2% | $1,507,000 | $1,303 | 15.3% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $10,000 | $9 | $60,000 | $56 | $944,000 | $816 | |||
Construction: | $0 | $0 | $18,000 | $17 | $800,000 | $691 | |||
Total Other: | $49,000 | $43 | $20,000 | $19 | $49,000 | $42 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $205,000 | $181 | $262,000 | $244 | $255,000 | $220 | |||
Total Salary: | $5,227,000 | $4,617 | $4,798,000 | $4,472 | $4,813,000 | $4,160 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $3,638,000 | $3,214 | 69.6% | $3,357,000 | $3,129 | 70.0% | $3,542,000 | $3,061 | 73.6% |
Other Salary: | $1,589,000 | $1,404 | 30.4% | $1,441,000 | $1,343 | 30.0% | $1,271,000 | $1,099 | 26.4% |
Total Benefit: | $2,914,000 | $2,574 | $2,631,000 | $2,452 | $2,605,000 | $2,252 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $2,019,000 | $1,784 | 69.3% | $1,843,000 | $1,718 | 70.0% | $1,897,000 | $1,640 | 72.8% |
Other Benefit: | $895,000 | $791 | 30.7% | $788,000 | $734 | 30.0% | $708,000 | $612 | 27.2% |
* Lincoln Elementary School District 156 was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.